Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1998

State v. Landy Kash

State v. Landy Kash
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Decided February 23, 1998

State v. Landy Kash

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED JANUARY SESSION, 1998 February 23, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9705-CR-00179 ) Appellee, ) ) SMITH COUNTY V. ) ) ) HON. J.O. BOND, JUDGE LANDY G. KASH, ) ) Appe llant. ) (DUI TH IRD OF FENS E)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: JACKY O. BELLAR JOHN KNOX WALKUP BELLAR & BELLAR Attorney General & Reporter M ain Stree t P.O. Box 332 CLINT ON J. M ORG AN Carthage, TN 37030 Assistant Attorney General 2nd Floor, Cordell Hull Building Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243 TOM P. THO MPS ON, JR .

District Attorn ey Ge neral H. DOUGLAS HALL Assistant District Attorney General C herry Stre et Lebanon, TN 37087-3609

OPINION FILED ________________________ APPEAL DISMISSED THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE OPINION After being convicted of DUI, third offense, and driving on a revoked license following a jury trial, the Defendant, Landy G. Kash, filed a Motion for New Trial on December 12, 1996. There is no order in the record either granting or denying that motion. There is a handwritten notation on the motion that it was overruled, but the judge ’s signature does n ot appe ar in the no tation. Ho wever, for a n order to be valid, it must b e in writing a nd it mus t be enter ed in the c ourt’s m inutes. See Evans v. Perkey, 647 S.W .2d 636 , 641 (T enn. Ap p. 1982 ); We lch v. State , 553 S.W.2d 917, 919-20 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1977). The time for appeal runs from the entry of a proper order de nying a n ew trial. Te nn. R. A pp. P. 4(c ).

In Hutchison v. ARO Corp., 653 S.W .2d 738, 740 (Tenn. Ap p. 1983), the co urt held that in the absence of a ruling on the motion for new trial, there has been no final disposition in the lowe r court, and that accordingly, there is no appeal as of right and the notice of appeal is of no effect. This Court’s appellate jurisdiction is limited to review of th e final judg ments of trial courts, and therefore, we ca nnot e ntertain this appeal as we are without jurisdiction to do so. Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-5-108(a). The appeal is therefore dismissed.

____________________________________ THOMAS T. W OODALL, Judge

CONCUR:

___________________________________ DAVID H. WELLES , Judge ___________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, Judge -2- -3-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.