Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong
Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED March 12, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. SCOTT BALDWIN, J. L. SMITH, and ) Appellate Court Clerk KEVIN T. BROWN, individually and ) on behalf of a class of individuals ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9804-CV-00195 VS. ) ) Davidson Circuit PIRELLI ARMSTRONG TIRE ) No. 95C-3232 CORPORATION, UNITED RUBBER, ) CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC ) WORKERS OF AMERICA, AND ) URW LOCAL UNION 670, ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )
ORDER ON PETITIONS TO REHEAR
Pirelli and the Union defendants have filed petitions to rehear. We have decided that the petitions are without merit and should be denied.
It is, therefore, ordered that both petitions to rehear be denied.
______________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, PRESIDING JUDGE, M.S.
______________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
______________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.