Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000

Robert Covert v. Kimberloy Covert

Robert Covert v. Kimberloy Covert
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Decided December 27, 2000 · Judge Houston M. Goddard

Robert Covert v. Kimberloy Covert

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 4, 2000 Session ROBERT CARL COVERT v. KIMBERLY MARIE BRUGGER COVERT Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Blount County No. S-5149 FILED DECEMBER 27, 2000 No. E2000-00864-COA-R3-CV

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., concurring.

I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm the trial court’s judgment. I agree with the majority that Father’s severance pay falls within the ambit of the language of Section 15 of the parties’ MDA. Under the circumstances of this case, I do not believe that Father’s severance pay should be considered as income for child support purposes. In this regard, I again agree with the majority; however, I disagree with the suggestion in the majority opinion that even if the severance pay were considered to be income, there would be a sufficient basis in law for ignoring it when calculating child support. Cf. Jones v. Jones, 930 S.W.2d 541, 543-546 (Tenn. 1996). While I believe the trial court reached the right result in setting child support, I disagree with that court’s reasoning on the deviation issue.

Except as noted in this separate opinion, I concur in the majority opinion.

___________________________________ CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.