IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON VENESSA LYNN TOTTY v. MICHAEL ALAN TOTTY An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 157141-5 R.D. Kay S. Robilio, Judge

No. W1999-02426-COA-R3-CV - Decided May 2, 2000

JUDGE FARMER , concurring.

SEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the results reached by the majority in this case. With respect to the issue of counseling, I agree with the majority that the statute has become inapplicable in the present case due to the child having reached majority. I write separately because of my concern that the majority opinion might be interpreted as limiting a trial court’s discretion to order counseling to that specifically set forth in T.C.A. § 36-6-101(e)(1), the text of which is set forth in the majority opinion.

I interpret the statute to be permissive rather than prohibitive. For example, I can envision a trial court ordering a non-custodial parent to undergo counseling for anger management as a condition of exercising visitation rights. I do not believe the aforementioned statute prohibits this.