Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2001

Sandy Sanders v. David W. Lanier, In his individual and in his offical capacities, and the State of Tennessee

Sandy Sanders v. David W. Lanier, In his individual and in his offical capacities, and the State of Tennessee
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Decided December 4, 2001 · Judge Herschel Pickens Franks

Sandy Sanders v. David W. Lanier, In his individual and in his offical capacities, and the State of Tennessee

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTI ON AT JACKSON FILED December 4, _______________________________ 2001 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk

SANDY SANDERS, ) Dye r Cha nc e r y Cour t ) No. 93- 166 Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt , ) ) v. ) ) DAVI D W LANI ER, I N HI S . ) I NDI VI DUAL AND I N HI S ) OFFI CI AL CAPACI TI ES, AND ) C/ A NO. 02A01- 9412- CH- 00276 THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) De f e nda nt s - Appe l l e e s . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________________________________________________ _ _

Fr o m t he Cha nc e r y Cour t of Dye r Count y a t Dye r s bur g, Ho no r a bl e W l l i am H. I nm i an, Se ni or Judge , Si t t i ng by De s i g nat i on.

J e r r ol d L. Be c ke r a nd Sc ar l e t t A. Be at y, LOCKRI DGE, BECKER & VALONE, P. C. , Knoxvi l l e , Te nne s s e e , At t or n e y f or Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt .

Cha r l e s W Bur s on, At t or ne y Ge ne r a l a nd Re por t e r , a nd .

S. El i z abe t h M t i n, As s i s t a nt At t or ne y Ge ne r a l , Na s hvi l l e , ar Te nn e s s e e , Fo r Ap pe l l e e , St a t e of Te nne s s e e .

OPI NI ON FI LED: REVERSED AND REMANDED FRANKS, J.

CRAWFORD, P. J. ( W S. ) : ( Conc ur s ) .

FARMER, J . : ( Conc ur s )

Pl a i nt i f f ’ s a c t i on f i l e d a ga i ns t t he St a t e pur s ua n t t o t h e Te nne s s e e Huma n Ri ght s Ac t ( THRA) , Te nne s s e e Code An n o t a t e d §4- 20- 191, e t s e q. , wa s di s mi s s e d by t he Tr i a l J u d g e f o r f a i l ur e t o s t a t e a c a us e of a c t i on. T. R. C. P. Rul e 2 . 0 2 ( 6) .

Pl a i nt i f f a l l e ge d s he i s e mpl oye d a s a Yout h Se r v i c e s Of f i c e r wi t h t he J uve ni l e Cour t of Dye r Count y, Te n n e s s e e . Thi s pos i t i on i s c ompe ns a t e d by t he Count y 1 . Sh e a l l e ge d t ha t s he wa s s e xua l l y ha r a s s e d by Cha nc e l l or Da vi d La n i e r , a St a t e j udge , who pr e s i de d ove r bot h Cha nc e r y a nd Co u n t y J uve ni l e Cour t 2 . She a ve r s t ha t whe n s he r e j e c t e d h i s

T. C. A. §37- 1- 106.

1 9 7 2 P u b l i c Ac t s 1 6 7 6 - 1 6 8 0 , Ch . 8 6 3 ( c r e a t i n g a l a w a n d e q u i t y c o u r t i n Dy e r Co u n t y , TN) r e a d s i n p a r t : Se c t i o n 1 . Th e r e i s h e r e b y c r e a t e d t h e La w a n d Eq u i t y Co u r t f o r Dy e r Co u n t y , Te n n e s s e e , t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n o f wh i c h s h a l l b e c o - e x t e n s i v e wi t h Dy e r Co u n t y .

Se c t i o n 2 . Th e La w a n d E q u i t y Co u r t f o r Dy e r Co u n t y s h a l l h a v e c o n c u r r e n t j u r i s d i c t i o n wi t h t h e Ch a n c e r y Co u r t o f Dy e r Co u n t y a n d t h e Ci r c u i t Co u r t o f Dy e r Co u n t y , a n d s a i d Co u r t a n d t h e J u d g e t h e r e o f s h a l l b e v e s t e d wi t h a l l t h e c o mmo n l a w a n d s t a t u t o r y p o we r s o f t h e Ch a n c e r y Co u r t s , a n d t h e Ci r c u i t a n d L a w Co u r t s , a n d t h e j u d g e s t h e r e o f . . .

Se c t i o n 1 1 . Th e J u d g e o f t h e La w a n d E q u i t y Co u r t o f Dy e r Co u n t y , Te n n e s s e e s h a l l h a v e a n d e x e r c i s e a l l p r o b a t e j ur i s di c t i on and a l l j uve ni l e j ur i s di c t i on of al l j uve ni l e c a s e s a r i s i n g wi t h i n Dy e r Co u n t y , Te n n e s s e e , a n d t h e Co u n t y Cl e r k o f Dy e r Co u n t y , Te n n e s s e e s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o ma i n t a i n a d v a n c e s , t he Cha nc e l l or de mot e d he r , a nd s he br ought t hi s a c t i o n a l l e gi ng s e xua l di s c r i mi na t i on i n e mpl oyme nt .

The Tr i a l Cour t de t e r mi ne d t ha t t he St a t e of Te nn e s s e e wa s n ot p l a i nt i f f ’ s ?e mpl oye r ? f or t he pur pos e s of THRA. Be f or e t he Tr i a l Cour t , p l a i nt i f f r e l i e d on Si bl e y M mo r i al Hos pi t al v . W l s on, 488 F. 2d 1338 ( D. C. Ci r . 1973) , e i a nd wh i l e t he Tr i a l J udg e r e i t e r a t e d t ha t Si bl e y he l d t ha t t he Ac t r e a c he s be yond t he c ont e xt of di r e c t e mpl oyme nt , he c o n c l u de d: I n Hi l l v . Ne w Yor k Ci t y Boar d of Educ at i on, 808 F. Supp. 141 ( E. D. N. Y. 1992) t he pl a i nt i f f , a bl a c k ma l e , e mpl oye d by a n i nde pe nde nt c ont r a c t or a s a b u s dr i ve r wa s d e c e r t i f i e d by t he Boa r d, a nd l a t e r f i r e d by t he c ont r a c t or .

The Cour t ga v e s hor t s hr i f t t o hi s c l a i m t ha t he wa s a n e mpl oye e o f t he Boa r d, s a yi ng . . . ?t hi s a r gume nt i gno r e s t he f unda me nt a l pr e di c a t e of Ti t l e VI I l i a bi l i t y - t he e xi s t e nc e of a n e mpl oyme nt r e l a t i ons hi p be t we e n t he one who di s c r i mi na t e s a ga i ns t a not he r a nd t ha t ot he r who f i nds hi ms e l f t h e vi c t i m o f d i s c r i mi na t i on. ?

W t h d ue de f e r e nc e t o t he Tr i a l J udge , t he Hi l l Cour t ’ s i h o l d i ng i s i n a c c or d wi t h Si bl e y , a nd e mpl oye d t he s o- c a l l e d ?e c on omi c r e a l i t i e s ? t e s t s e t f or t h i n Spr i t v . Te ac he r s I n s u r a nc e and Annui t i e s As s oc i at i on, 691 F. 2d 1054 ( 2nd Ci r .

1 9 8 2 ) , va c a t e d 463 U. S. 1223 103 S. Ct . 3565, 77 L. Ed. 2d 140 6 ( 1 9 8 3 ) , on r e ma nd 735 F. 2d 23, 2nd Ci r . Ce r t . de ni e d 469 U. S.

8 8 1 , 105 S. Ct . 247, 83 L. Ed. 185 ( 1984) , t o hol d: ?Unde r Spr i t , i t i s c l e a r t ha t t he Boa r d of Educ a t i on wa s a ‘ Ti t l e VI I e mpl oye r ’ i n t hi s c a s e .

The Boa r d ha d t he e xc l us i ve powe r t o c e r t i f y pl a i nt i f f t o dr i ve on Boa r d of Educ a t i on r out e s , a nd, be c a us e Amboy di d bus i ne s s onl y wi t h t he Boa r d , s uc h c e r t i f i c a t i on powe r wa s t a t a mount t o a ‘ ve t o ’

a l l r e c o r d s o f j u v e n i l e a n d p r o b a t e c a s e s wh e r e wi t h i n t h e s p e c i a l j u r i s d i c t i o n o f t h e Co u n t y Co u r t . . . .

powe r by t he Boa r d ove r pl a i nt i f f ’ s e mpl oyme nt . ?

I d. a t 148.

A c ompl a i nt wi l l be di s mi s s e d f or f a i l ur e t o s t a t e a c l a i m upon whi c h r e l i e f ma y be gr a nt e d, onl y i f a f t e r t a ki n g t he a l l e ga t i ons o f t he c ompl a i nt a s t r ue , t h e r e i s no s e t of f a c t s unde r whi c h p l a i nt i f f woul d be e nt i t l e d t o r e l i e f .

Le wi s v . Al l e n, 698 S. W 2d 58 ( Te nn. 1985) ; T. R. A. P. 12. 02( 6 ) . .

Ou r r e vi e w of t he Tr i a l J udge ’ s a c t i on i n t hi s c a s e i s de n o v o wi t h n o pr e s umpt i on of c or r e c t ne s s , s i nc e t he i s s ue i s a q u e s t i on o f l a w. T. R. A. P. Rul e 13( d) .

THRA s t a t e s t ha t i t i s a di s c r i mi na t or y pr a c t i c e f o r a n e mp l oye r t o: ( 1) Fa i l or r e f us e t o hi r e or di s c ha r ge a ny pe r s on or ot he r wi s e t o di s c r i mi na t e a ga i ns t a n i ndi vi dua l wi t h r e s pe c t t o c ompe ns a t i on, t e r ms , c ondi t i ons or pr i vi l e ge s of e mpl oyme nt be c a us e of s uc h i ndi vi dua l s ’ r a c e , c r e e d, c ol or , r e l i gi on, s e x, a g e or na t i ona l o r i gi n . . . . T. C. A. §4- 21- 401( 1) .

?Empl oye r ? i s de f i ne d a s i nc l udi ng ?t he s t a t e , o r a n y p o l i t i c a l or c i vi l s ubdi vi s i on t he r e of , a nd pe r s ons e mpl oyi n g e i g h t ( 8) or mor e pe r s ons wi t hi n t he s t a t e , or a ny pe r s on a c t i n g a s a n a ge nt of a n e mpl oye r , di r e c t l y or i ndi r e c t l y. ?

T. C. A. §4- 21- 102( 4) .

Our c our t s i nt e r pr e t THRA i n a c c or da nc e wi t h i t s p a r a l l e l f e de r a l ve r s i on, Ti t l e VI I . Br uc e v . W s t e r n Aut o e S u p p l y Co. , 669 S. W 2d 95 ( Te nn. App. 1984) . . Al s o s e e 906 F. Su p p . 441 ( E. D. Te nn. 1995) ( THRA a nd Ti t l e VI I s houl d be s i mi l a r l y c ons t r ue d, s i nc e bot h ha ve t he s a me pur pos e . ) 3

T. C. A. §421- 101( a ) pr ovi de s : I t i s t h e p u r p o s e a n d i n t e n t o f t h e g e n e r a l a s s e mb l y b y t h i s c h a p t e r t o ( 1 ) P r o v i d e f o r e x e c u t i o n wi t h i n Te n n e s s e e o f t h e p o l i c i e s e mb o d i e d i n t h e f e d e r a l Ci v i l Ri g h t s a c t s o f 1 9 6 4 , 1 9 6 8 Fe de r a l Cour t s ha ve i nt e r pr e t e d Ti t l e VI I ’ s d e f i n i t i on of ?e mpl oye r ? t o r e a c h be yond t he e nt i t i e s whi c h l i t e r a l l y wr i t e a n e mpl o ye e ’ s pa y c he c k. Si nc e t he Ac t di d n o t d e f i ne ?e mpl oye e ?, t he Cour t s ha ve l ooke d t o t he Na t i ona l La b o r Re l a t i ons Ac t f or gui da nc e i n a s c e r t a i ni ng l e gi s l a t i ve i nt e n t . Ar br us t e r v . Qu i nn, 711 F. 2d 1332, 1341 ( 6t h Ci r .

1983) .

The ?e c onomi c r e a l i t i e s t e s t ? e mpl oye d by Fe de r a l Co u r t s ha s e s t a bl i s he d a f l e xi bl e s t a nda r d t ha t t e nds t owa r d i n c l u s i on of a br oa d numbe r of wor ke r s unde r t he pr ot e c t i on o f t he Ac t . Se e e . g. , Re al v . Dr i s c ol l St r awbe r r y As s oc i at i on , I nc . , 603 F. 2d 748, ( 9t h Ci r . 1979) , Lut he r v . Z. W l s on, i I nc . , 528 F. Supp. 1166 ( S. D. Ohi o 1981) . The e c onomi c r e a l i t i e s t e s t f or e mpl oye e s t a t us ha s be e n de ve l ope d by t h e c a s e s f oc us i ng on t he a bi l i t y of e mpl oye r s a nd ot he r s t o c o n t r o l a c c e s s t o e mpl oyme nt oppor t uni t i e s , t he t e r ms a nd c o n d i t i ons of e mpl oyme nt , a nd whe t he r t he a l l e ge d e mpl oye e u n d e r t he c i r c ums t a nc e s i s s ubj e c t t o t he e f f e c t s of unl a wf u l d i s c r i m na t i on. i The f i r s t c a s e t o t a ke t hi s a ppr oa c h wa s Si bl e y , wh e r e t he hos pi t a l a r gue d t ha t be c a us e t he r e wa s no e mpl oyme n t r e l a t i ons hi p b e t we e n t he pl a i nt i f f a nd t he hos pi t a l , t h e p l a i n t i f f ha d no c a us e of a c t i on. The Cour t , howe ve r , f oc u s e d o n t h e e c onomi c r e a l i t i e s of t he r e l a t i ons hi p a nd c onc l ude d t ha t t he f or ma l r e l a t i on s hi p be t we e n t he pl a i nt i f f a nd t he h o s p i t a l di d not c ont r ol , r a t he r t he i s s ue be i ng whe t he r t h e h o s p i t a l ha d t he powe r t o a f f e c t t he pl a i nt i f f ’ s e mpl oyme nt .

a nd 1972. . . .

The Cour t i n Ar br us t e r , i n a dopt i ng t he e c onomi c r e a l i t i e s t e s t , s a i d t ha t i t woul d e xa mi ne whe t he r t he e mp l o y e r wa s i n a pos i t i on t o a f f e c t t he ongoi ng wor ki ng c o n d i t i ons of t he e mpl oye e , a nd c onc l ude d t ha t c ongr e s s i n t e n d e d t o pr ot e c t a l l wor ke r s f r om di s c r i mi na t or y pr a c t i c e s , u n l e s s s uc h wor ke r s we r e e xc l ude d by s pe c i f i c s t a t ut or y e x c e p t i on. The Cour t s a i d ?t ha t t he t e r m ‘ e mpl oye e i n Ti t l e VI I mu s t be r e a d i n l i gh t of t he mi s c hi e f t o be c or r e c t e d, a n d t h e e n d t o be a t t a i ne d. ’ 322 U. S. a t 124, 64 S. Ct . a t 857 ( c i t a t i ons o mi t t e d) . ? The mos t i mpor t a nt f a c t or i n t hi s t e s t i s t h e e mpl oye r ’ s a bi l i t y t o c ont r ol t he j ob pe r f or ma nc e a n d e mp l o y me nt oppor t uni t i e s of t he pl a i nt i f f . Ey e r man v . M y ar Ka y Cos me t i c s , 967 F. 2d 213, 219 ( 6t h Ci r . 1992) .

He r e , p l a i nt i f f a l l e ge s t ha t La ni e r ha d t he a u t ho r i t y t o h i r e , d i s c i pl i ne , p r omot e , d e mot e , o r t e r mi na t e a l l j u ve ni l e c our t e mpl oye e s , i nc l udi ng s e c r e t a r i e s a nd j uv e n i l e o f f i c e r s . She a l l e ge d t ha t La ni e r , i n r e t a l i a t i on f o r t h e r e j e c t i on of hi s s e xua l a dva nc e s , de mot e d he r f r om h e r s u p e r v i s or y pos i t i on. She a l l e ge d t ha t La ni e r de ni e d he r a n i n c r e a s e i n s a l a r y a nd uni l a t e r a l l y c ha nge d he r j ob r e q u i r e me nt s a nd r e s pons i bi l i t i e s on a we e k- t o- we e k ba s i s .

Ta k i n g t he a l l e ga t i ons of t he c ompl a i nt a s t r ue , s he ha s d e mo n s t r a t e d t ha t La ni e r di r e c t e d he r wor k, s upe r vi s e d he r a s s i g n me nt s , c ont r ol l e d he r s a l a r y, a nd de t e r mi ne d he r j ob s e c ur i t y.

The s e a l l e ga t i ons me e t t he e l e me nt s of t he c ommon l a w t e s t of c ont r ol whi c h a s ks whe t he r t he a l l e ge d e mpl oye r h a d t he r i ght t o hi r e , f i r e , s upe r vi s e , a nd s e t t he wor k s c h e d ul e of t he e mpl oye e . De al v . St at e Far m M ual I ns ur a n c e ut Co . Of Te x as , 5 F. 3r d 117, 119 ( 5t h Ci r . 1993) . The s e a l l e ga t i ons a l s o me e t t h e r e qui r e me nt s of t he ?e c onomi c r e a l i t i e s ? t e s t , whi c h a s ks whe t he r t he e mpl oye r s e t t he t e r ms a n d c ondi t i ons of e mpl oyme nt a nd c ont r ol l e d t he j ob p e r f o r ma nc e a nd oppor t uni t i e s f or a dva nc e me nt . Ar br us t e r ; Ey e r ma n and De al .

I n t he c a s e of ha r r a s s me nt by a s upe r vi s or , a n e mp l o y e r i s r e s pons i bl e f or t he a c t i ons of i t s a ge nt , Pi e r c e v . Co mmonwe al t h Li f e I ns ur anc e Co. , 40 F. 3d 796 ( 6t h Ci r .

1 9 9 4 ) , c i t i ng Kauf f man v . Al l i e d Si gnal , I nc . , Aut ol i t e Di v . , 7 0 F. 2d 178, 183 ( 6t h Ci r . 1992) ( hol di ng t ha t t he ?kne w or s h o u l d ha ve known? s t a nda r d doe s not a ppl y t o s e xua l h a r a s s me nt c a s e s ) ; al s o s e e 29 C. F. R. 1604. 11( c ) ( ?Appl yi ng g e n e r a l Ti t l e VI I p r i nc i pl e s , a n e mpl oye r . . . i s r e s pons i bl e f o r i t s a c t s a nd t hos e of i t s a ge nt s a nd s upe r vi s or y e mpl oy e e s wi t h r e s pe c t t o s e xua l h a r a s s me nt r e ga r dl e s s of whe t he r t he s p e c i f i c a c t s we r e a ut ho r i z e d or e ve n f or bi dde n by t he e mp l o y e r a nd r e ga r dl e s s of whe t he r t he e mpl oye r kne w or wou l d h a v e k nown of t he i r oc c ur r e nc e . ?) . Age nc y i s de t e r mi ne d by e x a mi n i ng f a c t or s s uc h a s whe n t he a c t t ook pl a c e , whe r e i t t o o k p l a c e , a nd whe t he r i t wa s f or s e e a bl e . Yat e s v . Av c o Cor p . , 819 F. 2d 630, 636 ( 6t h Ci r . 1987) . An a c t ma y be wi t hi n t he s c ope o f e mpl oyme nt e ve n i f i t i s s pe c i f i c a l l y f o r b i d de n. I d. , c i t i ng Re s t a t e me nt ( Se c ond) of Age nc y, §21 7 - 3 2 ( 1958) .

La ni e r ’ s a ut h or i t y f or pr e s i di ng ove r t he Count y J u v e n i l e Cour t wa s ba s e d on a n a c t of t he s t a t e l e gi s l a t ur e .

1 9 7 2 Publ i c Ac t s 1676- 1680, c h. 863. Pl a i nt i f f ’ s c ompl a i nt a l l e g e s t ha t t he St a t e wi l l f ul l y f a i l e d t o a de qua t e l y s u p e r v i s e , moni t or , or d i s c i pl i ne J udge La ni e r , e ve n a f t e r h e b e c a me t he s ubj e c t o f a f e de r a l i nve s t i ga t i on. Ta ki ng t he s e a l l e g a t i ons a l ong wi t h t hos e r e ga r di ng hi s s upe r vi s or y c ont r o l o f t h e J uve ni l e Cour t a s t r ue , we c a nnot s a y t he pl a i nt i f f c a n p r o v e no s e t of f a c t s whi c h woul d e nt i t l e he r t o r e l i e f a g a i ns t t he St a t e . Se e Pi e r c e .

At f i r s t bl us h , t he St a t e ma de a n a ppe a l i ng a r gume n t t h a t i t s houl d not be c ons i de r e d a n e mpl oye r be c a us e i t i s n o t i n a p os i t i on t o g r a nt a l l t he s t a t ut or y r e l i e f t he pl a i nt i f f wa s e n t i t l e d t o unde r t h e Ac t . Thi s a r gume nt wa s a ns we r e d i n S i b l e y , whe r e t he Cour t s a i d: Appe l l a nt a r gue s t ha t t hi s pr ovi s i on ?c onc e r ns r e l i e f t ha t onl y a n e mpl oye r c a n gi ve t o i t s e mpl oye e s ?. The s t a t ut or y e nnume r a t i on of r e me di e s i s b y i t s t e r ms , h owe ve r , i l l u s t r a t i ve r a t he r t ha n e xha us t i ve ; a nd i t a l s o r e a c he s e xpl i c i t l y be yond t he c ont e xt of di r e c t e mpl oyme nt t o e mpl oyme nt a ge nc i e s a nd l a bor or ga ni z a t i ons . W l e ne i t he r hi hi r i ng nor r e i ns t a t e me nt ma y be r e l e va nt out s i de t h e c ont e xt of di r e c t e mpl oyme nt , bot h i nj unc t i ve a nd ba c k pa y r e l i e f ( i n t he s e ns e of mone t a r y da ma ge s f or l os t e mpl oyme nt oppor t uni t i e s ) ma y be a va i l a b l e , i n a n a ppr opr i a t e c a s e , a ga i ns t r e s ponde nt s who a r e ne i t he r a c t ua l nor pot e nt i a l di r e c t e mpl oye r s of pa r t i c ul a r c o mpl a i na nt s , but who c ont r ol a c c e s s t o s uc h e mpl oyme nt a nd who de ny s uc h a c c e s s by r e f e r e nc e t o i nvi di ous c r i t e r i a .

4 8 8 F. 2d 1342.

W c onc l ude t ha t t he e l e me nt s of a THRA c l a i m ha ve e

La n i e r wa s a n e l e c t e d S t a t e o f f i c i a l , a n d t h e Co u n t y coul d exe r c i s e no c ont r ol over hi s conduc t . Ho we v e r , t h r o u g h S t a t e a c t i o n t h e Co u r t Of Th e J u d i c i a r y h a d j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r La n i e r ’ s c o n d u c t a s a j u d g e , T. C. A.

§ 1 7 - 5 - 1 0 1 , e t s e q . , a n d t h e S u p r e me Co u r t i n 1 9 9 3 e s t a bl i s h e d pr oc e dur e s t o d e a l wi t h s e x u a l h a r r a s s me n t i n t h e j u d i c i a l d e p a r t me n t . Se e Ad mi n i s t r a t i v e Di r e c t o r y 9 3 - 5 .

b e e n a l l e ge d a ga i ns t t he St a t e , a nd t he Tr i a l Cour t ’ s j udgme n t i s r e ve r s e d. The c a us e wi l l be r e i ns t a t e d t o t he Tr i a l Co u r t ’ s doc ke t f or f ur t he r pr oc e e di ngs c ons i s t e nt wi t h t hi s o p i n i on.

The c os t o f t he a ppe a l i s a s s e s s e d t o a ppe l l e e .

________________________ He r s c he l P. Fr a nks , J .

CONCUR:

_ _ _ _ _ ______________________ W l l i a m F. Cr a wf or d, P. J . ( W S. ) i .

_ _ _ _ _ _ __________________ ___ Da vi d R. Fa r me r , J .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.