State of Tennessee v. John A. Boatfield
State of Tennessee v. John A. Boatfield
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 25, 2001 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN A. BOATFIELD Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County Nos. 222129, 2221315 Rebecca J. Stern, Judge
No. E2000-01500-CCA-R3-CD December 20, 2001
JOSEPH M. TIPTON , J., concurring.
I concur in all respects save one. I seriously question the conclusion that all of the victim’s statements to her mother were admissible as excited utterances. A declarant’s opinion about who caused an event would ordinarily not be admissible even if the declarant appeared and testified at a trial. Here, I do not believe that the victim’s opinion about who started the fire was admissible.
However, given the location and timing of the fire, the inferences drawn by the victim as to the potential cause of it would be obvious to the jury in any event. Thus, I do not believe that the error affected the verdict.
_____________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.