Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2004

Rhonda Lee Smith (Baliles) v. Home Beneficial Life Insurance Company

Rhonda Lee Smith (Baliles) v. Home Beneficial Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Decided August 17, 2004 · Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard

Rhonda Lee Smith (Baliles) v. Home Beneficial Life Insurance Company

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE EASTERN SECTI ON

RHONDA LEE SM TH ( BALI LES) I ) BRADLEY COUNTY ) 03A01- 9606- CH- 00195 Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt ) ) ) v. ) HON. EARL H. HENLEY, ) CHANCELLOR ) HOM BENEFI CI AL LI FE E ) APPEAL DI SM SSED I N PART; I I NSURANCE COMPANY ) J UDGMENT AFFI RMED I N PART, ) VACATED I N PART, a nd REM ANDED De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e )

W LLI AM J . BROW OF CLEVELAND FOR APPELLANT I N M CHAEL E. CALLAW OF CLEVELAND FOR APPELLEE I AY CHARLES W BURSON, At t or ne y Ge ne r a l a nd Re por t e r , a nd .

J OHN A. MOORE, As s i s t a nt At t or ne y Ge ne r a l , NASHVI LLE, FOR LARRY W ALLACE, Di r e c t or o f t he TENNESSEE BUREAU OF I NVESTI GATI ON

O P I N I O N

Godda r d, P. J .

Thi s c a s e i s be f or e us pur s ua nt t o t he gr a nt of t wo Ru l e 9 I nt e r l oc ut or y Appe a l s , one t o Pl a i nt i f f Rhonda Le e Smi t h a nd t h e ot he r t o La r r y W l l a c e , i n hi s of f i c i a l c a pa c i t y a s a Di r e c t o r of t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I nve s t i ga t i on.

The s ui t gi vi ng r i s e t o t he s e a ppe a l s s t e ms f r om t he d i s a p p e a r a nc e of Cha r l e s Ve r non Smi t h i n J une of 1985, whi l e h e wa s ma r r i e d t o M . Ba l i l e s . s Pr i or t o hi s di s a ppe a r a nc e , M . r Smi t h p ur c ha s e d a whol e l i f e i ns ur a nc e pol i c y f r om Home Be n e f i c i a l i n t he a mount of $100, 000 wi t h a c c i de nt a l de a t h b e n e f i t s i n a n a ddi t i ona l a mount of $100, 000. Thi s pol i c y na me d M . Ba l i l e s a s t he b e ne f i c i a r y. s I t i s M . Ba l i l e s ' s t he or y t ha t M . Smi t h wa s t he vi c t i m of a c ont r a c t ki l l i ng by Bobby Cha dwi c k r a t t h e i ns t a nc e of De no M Ke nz i e . c

Al t hough ot he r i s s ue s a r e r a i s e d i n t hi s Cour t , we ma y o n l y c o n s i de r t hos e i s s ue s s pe c i f i e d i n t he Tr i a l Cour t ' s or de r s g r a n t i n g t he s e a ppe a l s :

MS. BALI LES APPEAL

I t i s t he r e f or e ORDERED, ADJ UDGED AND DECREED THAT t h e mot i on of t he de f e nda nt Home Be ne f i c i a l Li f e I n s ur a nc e Compa ny t o s t r i ke t he de pos i t i ons of Shi r l e y Ha mi l t on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Ge r a l d Pr e s l e y of t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I nve s t i ga t i on i s gr a nt e d.

I t i s f ur t he r ORDERED t ha t t he pl a i nt i f f i s g r a nt e d a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l t o t he Cour t of Appe a l s a s t o t he i s s ue s of t he s t r i ki ng of t he de pos i t i ons a s we l l a s t he pl a i nt i f f ' s mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt , a n d t he t r i a l da t e of Apr i l 29, 1996 i s c ont i nue d p e ndi ng t hi s a ppe a l .

S h e wa s s u b s e q u e n t l y d i v o r c e d f r o m M . r S mi t h o n J u l y 3 1 , 1985.

MR. WALLACE' S APPEAL

It is f ur t he r ORDERED t ha t t he Te nne s s e e Bur e a u of I n ve s t i ga t i on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Ge r a l d Pr e s l e y a r e g r a nt e d a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l t o t he Cour t of Appe a l s a s t o t he i s s ue of whe t he r t he de pos i t i ons a r e p r i vi l e ge d a nd not s ubj e c t t o i nt r oduc t i on a s e vi de nc e at t r i al .

I n a ddr e s s i ng t he f i r s t poi nt s r a i s e d by M . Ba l i l e s , s we mu s t f i r s t l ook t o t he de f i ni t i on of he a r s a y f ound i n Rul e 8 0 1 o f t h e Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e :

Rul e 8 01. De f i ni t i ons .

The f ol l owi ng de f i ni t i ons a ppl y unde r t hi s ar t i cl e: ( a ) St a t e me nt . A " s t a t e me nt " i s ( 1) a n or a l or wr i t t e n a s s e r t i on or ( 2) nonve r ba l c onduc t of a pe r s on i f i t i s i nt e nde d by t he pe r s on a s a n a s s e r t i on. ( b) De c l a r a nt . A " d e c l a r a nt " i s a pe r s on who ma ke s a s t a t e me nt . ( c ) He a r s a y. " He a r s a y" i s a s t a t e me nt , 2 ot he r t ha n o n e ma de by t he de c l a r a nt whi l e t e s t i f yi ng a t t he t r i a l o r he a r i ng, of f e r e d i n e vi de nc e t o pr ove t he t r ut h of t h e ma t t e r a s s e r t e d.

A c ur s or y e xa mi na t i on of t he de pos i t i on of Shi r l e y Ha mi l t o n a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y de mons t r a t e s t ha t c e r t a i n t e s t i mo ny e l i c i t e d i s c l e a r l y not he a r s a y. For e xa mpl e , a s t o M . Ha mi l t on, s he t e s t i f i e d a s t o t he f ol l owi ng f a c t s a bout t he s t i me of M . Smi t h' s d i s a pp e a r a nc e : r

Or a l or wr i t t e n o r non- ve r ba l conduc t i nt e nde d as an a s s e r t i on.

1. He r t he n hus ba nd, Bobby Cha dwi c k, c a me i nt o t he i r h o me a n d " ha d bl ood down hi s s hi r t , down hi s pa nt s . " Ad d i t i o na l l y, on t hi s oc c a s i on, " he ha d a bi l l f ol d s t r e t c he d o u t i n h i s ha nd. I s e e n - - I don' t know i f i t wa s a dr i ve r ' s l i c e n s e o r a n I D or wha t . I t j us t ha d a pi c t ur e of M . Smi t h. " r On t h e s a me o c c a s i on, he t ook out a r e vol ve r a nd l a i d i t on t he c of f e e t a bl e . For s e ve r a l d a ys t he r e a f t e r , M . Smi t h wa s s i c k a nd c ou l d r n o t e a t nor dr i nk.

2. Tha t s ome t i me l a t e r , a t he r hus ba nd' s r e que s t , s h e a c c o mp a ni e d hi m t o t he home of De no M Ke nz i e , whe r e he r e move d a n c e n v e l o p e f r om M . M Ke nz i e ' s ma i l box a nd ha nde d i t t o he r . r c W en h s h e o p e ne d t he e nve l ope s he f ound i t c ont a i ne d $3000.

I t f ur t he r a ppe a r s t ha t e ve n s ome s t a t e me nt s t ha t a r e h e a r s a y mi ght be e xc e pt i ons t o t he ge ne r a l r ul e . Rul e 803, Te n n e s s e e Rul e s of Evi de nc e , 3r d Ed. W a l s o poi nt out wi t hou t e t r y i n g t o mi c r o- ma na ge t he Cha nc e l l or ' s t r i a l of t hi s c a s e t ha t q u e s t i o ns a nd c omma nds a r e a s a ge ne r a l r ul e a dmi s s i bl e . Se c t i o n 0 1 . 9 , Te nne s s e e La w of Ev i de nc e , 3r d Ed.

Fi na l l y, a s t o t ha t por t i on of M . Ba l i l e s ' s a ppe a l wh i c h a s s e r t s s he s houl d ha ve be e n gr a nt e d a s umma r y j udgme nt , we c a n n o t f i nd t ha t t he undi s put e d pr oof s hows M . Smi t h i s de c e a s e d r o r t h a t hi s de a t h r e s ul t e d a s a l l e ge d i n t he c ompl a i nt " f r om b o d i l y i nj ur i e s s us t a i ne d t hr ough e xt e r na l , vi ol e nt , a nd a c c i d e nt a l me a ns . "

As t o t he de pos i t i on of Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y, we r e c o g n i z e t ha t muc h of i t mi ght not be a dmi s s i bl e a s vi ol a t i ve o f t h e h e a r s a y r ul e but ot he r por t i ons a r e a nd, wi t h t hi s de pos i t i o n a s wi t h t he de pos i t i on of M . Ha mi l t on, t he r ul i ngs of t he Tr i a l s Co u r t s houl d be on a n a ns we r - by- a ns we r ba s i s whi c h c oul d ve r y we l l b e i nf l ue nc e d by t he t e s t i mony r e c e i ve d a t t r i a l pr i or t o t h e o f f e r of t he t e s t i mony c ont a i ne d i n t he de pos i t i ons .

I t a ppe a r s t he pr i nc i pa l c onc e r n a s t o M . W l l a c e ' s r a a p p e a l i s t ha t M . Ha mi l t on' s na me woul d be c ome known t o M . s r Ch a d wi c k whi c h woul d pl a c e he r i n pe r i l . The r e c or d di s c l os e s t h a t M . Cha dwi c k kne w t ha t M . Ha mi l t on wa s f ur ni s hi ng r s i n f o r ma t i on t o t he l a w e nf or c e me nt a ut hor i t y a nd gr a nt i ng a p r i v i l e ge t o pr ot e c t he r woul d be f ut i l e . W a c c or di ngl y e c o n c l u d e t ha t our gr a nt of a n i nt e r l oc ut or y a ppe a l a s t o M . r W l l a c e wa s i mpr ovi de nt a nd hi s a ppe a l i s a c c or di ngl y di s mi s s e d . a

For t he f or e goi ng r e a s ons we di s mi s s t he a ppe a l of M . r W l l a c e , v a c a t e t he o r de r of t he Tr i a l Cour t s t r i ki ng t he a d e p o s i t i ons of M . Ha mi l t on a nd Spe c i a l Age nt Pr e s l e y, a nd a f f i r m s h i s o r d e r de nyi ng s umma r y j udgme nt t o M . Ba l i l e s . s The c a us e i s r e ma n d e d f or f ur t he r pr oc e e di ngs not i nc ons i s t e nt wi t h t hi s opi ni on. Cos t s of a ppe a l a r e a dj udge d one - ha l f a ga i ns t M . s Ba l i l e s a nd o ne - ha l f a ga i ns t Home Be ne f i c i a l .

_______________________________ Hous t on M Godda r d, P. J . .

CONCUR:

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________________ Ch a r l e s D. Sus a no, J r . , J .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________________ W l l i a m H. I nma n, Sr . J . i

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.