State of Tennessee v. Christopher Shane Poole - Concurring
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Shane Poole - Concurring
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Shane Poole - Concurring
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 22, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER SHANE POOLE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. CR8729 Robert E. Burch, Judge
No. M2007-01041-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 29, 2008
JAMES CURWOOD WITT , JR., J., concurring.
I fully concur in the excellent majority opinion. I would simply add that Tennessee commercial law supports the majority’s conclusion that the payor bank held a valid claim against the defendant. Generally, “an unauthorized signature is ineffective except as the signature of the unauthorized signer in favor of a person who in good faith pays the instrument or takes it for value.”
T.C.A § 47-3-403(a) (2001).
___________________________________ JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.