State of Tennessee v. Randy Joe McNew - Concurring
State of Tennessee v. Randy Joe McNew - Concurring
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 28, 2009 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RANDY JOE MCNEW Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S51,902 R. Jerry Beck, Judge
No. E2008-02189-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 13, 2009
JOSEPH M. TIPTON , P.J., concurring.
I concur with the majority opinion. I believe, though, that the statement that the weight assigned to advisory enhancement and mitigating factors no longer has an appellate review provision should not preclude such an assessment relative to whether the sentence meets the principles and purposes of the Sentencing Act. That is, for example, using a five-year old conviction for speeding to enhance an aggravated burglary conviction to a maximum sentence may not meet the principles and purposes of the Sentencing Act because of inordinate weight given to the speeding conviction.
____________________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, PRESIDING JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.