State of Tennessee v. Curtis Palmer
State of Tennessee v. Curtis Palmer
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 7, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CURTIS PALMER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-04188 James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge
No. W2004-01748-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 9, 2005
JOSEPH M. TIPTON , J., concurring.
I concur in the results and most of the reasoning in the majority opinion. I respectfully disagree, though, with its conclusion that an oral request can suffice for the requirement in T.C.A.
§ 40-18-110(b), (c) that the jury instruction request must be in writing and specifically identify the lesser included offense for which instruction is sought. As I have previously concluded, though, the statute does not bar this court from considering the lack of an instruction on a lesser included offense as plain error. See State v. Roberto Vasques, et al., No. M2004-00166-CCA-R3-CD, Davidson County, slip op. at 24 (Tenn. Crim. App. Oct. 7, 2005). However, I agree with the majority opinion’s conclusion that any error was harmless.
____________________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.