Lawson v. Runions
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
ERIK LEE LAWSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) VS. ) No. 19-1129-JDT-cgc ) ) CANDACE RUNIONS, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS
On October 25, 2019, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff Erik Lee Lawson’s pro se prisoner complaint and granting leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) However, that order was returned undeliverable on November 13, 2019, marked “return to sender” and “unable to forward.” (ECF No. 8.)
The most basic responsibility of a litigant is to keep the Court apprised of his whereabouts, but Lawson has failed to do so. He also has failed to file an amended complaint. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED in its entirety, and judgment will be entered in accordance with the October 25, 2019, order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim. Lawson is assessed his first strike under § 1915(g). This strike shall take effect when judgment is entered. See Coleman v. Tollefson, 135 S. Ct. 1759, 1763-64 (2015).
It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a), that any appeal in this matter by Lawson would not be taken in good faith.
Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to prepare a judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.