IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________

CANTRAL JAMES ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 2:20-cv-02071-MSN-cgc

DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, and DEA AGENTS, Four White Men,

Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ______________________________________________________________________________

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Charmaine Claxton’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”), submitted on July 23, 2020. (ECF No. 7.) The Report recommends that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed pursuant to

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Id. at PageID 12.) Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and the time to do so has passed. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court ADOPTS the Report and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to

. LAW AND ANALYSIS Pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59, a district court may refer a motion to suppress to a magistrate judge for the preparation of a report and recommendation. “The magistrate judge must promptly conduct the required proceedings and enter on the record a recommendation for disposing of the matter, including any proposed findings of fact.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(1). If a party files timely objections to the recommendation, the district court must consider those objections de novo and “accept, reject, or modify the recommendation.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(3). “The filing of objections to a magistrate’s report enables the district judge to focus attention on those issues—factual and legal—that are at the heart of the parties’ dispute.” Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Therefore, objections to a magistrate judge’s report must be “specific.”

Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2). Vague, general, or conclusory objections are improper, will not be considered by the reviewing court, and are “tantamount to a complete failure to object.” Cole v. Yukins,

(6th Cir. 2001); see also Miller v. Currie,

(6th Cir. 1995) (“[A] general objection to a magistrate’s report, which fails to specify the issues of contention, does not satisfy the requirement that an objection be filed. The objections must be clear enough to enable the district court to discern those issues that are dispositive and contentious.”). The Court need not review—under a de novo or any other standard—those aspects of a report and recommendation to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Arn,

, 150–52 (1985). Failure to object to a magistrate judge’s findings or conclusions results in waiver of those objections. Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2). A district judge should adopt the findings and rulings of the

magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed. Brown v. Board of Educ.,

(W.D. Tenn. 2014). Here, the deadline to object to the Report has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error and finds none. For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS the Report and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to

.

2 IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of August, 2020.

s/ Mark Norris MARK S. NORRIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3