Jones v. Cunnuing

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Jones v. Cunnuing

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

DEWAYNE JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) VS. ) No. 20-1040-JDT-cgc ) MAGGIE CUNNINGHAM, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND NOTIFYING PLAINTIFF OF APPELLATE FILING FEE

On October 15, 2020, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff Dewayne Jones’s pro se complaint and granting leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Jones was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint within twenty-one days, the Court would dismiss the case in its entirety, assess a strike pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g), and enter judgment. (Id. at PageID 60-61.) Jones has not filed an amended complaint, and the time within which to do so has expired. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety, and judgment will be entered in accordance with the October 15, 2020, order dismissing the original complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Jones is assessed his first strike under § 1915(g). This strike shall take effect when judgment is entered. See Coleman v. Tollefson,

135 S. Ct. 1759, 1763-64

(2015). It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a), that any appeal in this matter by Jones would not be taken in good faith. If Jones nevertheless files a notice of appeal and wishes to pay the $505 appellate filing fee

using the installment procedures of the Prison Litigation Reform Act,

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915

(a)-(b), he also must submit a new in forma pauperis affidavit and a current copy of his inmate trust account statement for the last six months. The Clerk is directed to prepare a judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ James D. Todd JAMES D. TODD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown