Heggie v. Southern Health Partners

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Heggie v. Southern Health Partners

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BILLY RAY HEGGIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) No. 3:21-cv-00056 ) SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 62) recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice based on Billy Ray Heggie’s failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 41.01(b). Because no objections have been filed, de novo review is not required. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 151

(1985). However, the Court has reviewed the R&R de novo and agrees with the R&R. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 62) is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and this action is DISMISSSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.

WAVERLY RENSHAW. JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown