Eady v. Big G Express

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Eady v. Big G Express

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RONALD DWIGHT EADY, ) Plaintiff, Vv. No. 3:21-cv-00432 BIG G EXPRESS, Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 52) recommending the Court grant Big G Express’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 41) and dismiss the action with prejudice. Neither party filed a timely objection to the R&R. When no party objects to the R&R within 14 days of service, the Court need not independently review the matter. Thomas v. Amn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985). Regardless, the Court thoroughly reviewed the R&R and agrees with its recommended disposition. The R&R is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 41) is GRANTED. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This is a final order. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Wah. Eusbe Costin CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown