Decasper v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
Decasper v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
MICHAEL DECASPER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 3:20-CV-551-TAV-JEM ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER
This civil matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) entered by United States Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook on January 30, 2023 [Doc. 42]. In the R&R, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court award attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),
28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), consistent with the parties’ joint stipulation. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as waived. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), 72(b). After careful review of the matter, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS in full the R&R [Doc. 42] pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $6,137.80, pursuant to the EAJA; 2. In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586(2010), the EAJA fee is payable to Plaintiff as the litigant and may be subject to offset to satisfy a pre-existing debt that the litigant owes to the United States;
3. If Plaintiff owes no debt to the United States, payment of the EAJA fees may be made to Plaintiff’s counsel per the fee assignment [Doc. 37-3, p. 3]; and 4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [Doc. 37] is DENIED without prejudice, pursuant to the parties’ agreement [Doc. 41].
ENTER:
s/ Thomas A. Varlan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown