Hamilton v. Social Security Administration
Hamilton v. Social Security Administration
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
LISA A. HAMILTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:22-cv-00464 ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 23) recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16). Because no objections have been filed, the district court is not required to review the R&R de novo. Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 151(1985). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and the file in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings. This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.
wines CRENSHAW, J 1 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown