Bosserman v. Doe 1

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Bosserman v. Doe 1

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

FREDERICK JASON BOSSERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:22-cv-00960 ) WILLIAMSON COUNTY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 47) recommending the Court grant Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 26 and 28) and dismiss this case with prejudice. No timely objections to the R&R have been filed. The absence of objections releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Miller v. Currie,

50 F.3d 373, 380

(6th Cir. 1995); see also Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 150

(1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). Nevertheless, the Court thoroughly reviewed the R&R and agrees with its recommended disposition. Accordingly, the R&R (Doc. No. 47) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 26 and 28) are GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.

WAVERLY □□ As ENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown