Norwood v. Disability Rights Tennessee

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Norwood v. Disability Rights Tennessee

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION

LINDA J. NORWOOD and THE ) ORANGE GROVE CENTER, INC., ) ) 1:23-CV-00111-DCLC-CHS Plaintiffs, )

) v. ) ) DISABILITY RIGHTS TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER This matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger [Doc. 78]. On September 23, 2024, the magistrate judge granted Plaintiffs leave to file a Joint Amended Complaint and, as a result, recommends that Defendant Disability Rights Tennessee’s (“DRT”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 53] be dismissed as moot [Doc. 78, pg. 5]. No party has filed objections to the R&R and the time to do so has passed.1 See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). After thorough consideration of the R&R and the record as a whole, the Court finds that the magistrate judge properly analyzed the issues presented. For the reasons set out in the R&R, which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the R&R [Doc. 78] is ADOPTED. Accordingly, DRT’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 53] is DISMISSED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED: s/ Clifton L. Corker United States District Judge

1 Failure to file objections within the 14-day period pursuant to Rule 72(b) results in waiver of the right to appeal the Court’s order. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 153-54

(1985).

Reference

Status
Unknown