Monroe v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CAROLYN MONROE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 3:24-CV-280-TAV-DCP ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER This civil matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) entered by United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Poplin on March 7, 2025 [Doc. 19].
In the R&R, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court award attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), consistent with the parties’ joint stipulation. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.
After careful review of the matter, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS in full the R&R [Doc. 19] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The parties’ Joint Stipulations [Doc. 18] are ADOPTED to the extent that the parties agree that plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney fees in the amount of $4,717.99 under the EAJA; 2. In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the EAJA fee is payable to plaintiff as the litigant and may be subject to offset to satisfy a pre-existing debt that the litigant owes to the United States; 3. If plaintiff owes no debt to the United States, payment of the EAJA fees may be made to plaintiff’s counsel per any valid assignment accepted by the government; and 4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [Doc. 16] is DENIED as moot, pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulations [Doc. 18].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.