Costner v. Gram
Costner v. Gram
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
STEVEN S. COSTNER, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 3:24-CV-453-KAC-DCP ) SHAWN GRAM, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION
This action is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Poplin’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) [Doc. 12]. On November 6, 2024, Plaintiff Steven S. Costner Sr., who is proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint [Doc. 1] against Defendants. Upon screening the Complaint, the Report concluded that the Complaint failed to state a plausible claim against any Defendant [See Doc. 12 at 6-8].1 The Report further concluded that granting Plaintiff leave to amend sua sponte would be futile due to the significant deficiencies in the Complaint [See id. at 8]. Therefore, the Report recommends that the undersigned dismiss the Complaint [See id. at 9]. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report, and the time to do so has passed [See id., n. 12 (providing fourteen (14) days to file any objections to the Report)]. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.72(b)(2). As the Report ably analyzed, the Complaint, liberally construed, fails to state any claim upon which relief may be granted against any Defendant [See
id. at 6-8]. Because the Complaint
1 The Report also indicated that to the extent the Complaint could be read to assert a legal malpractice claim, not a federal claim under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Court would lack an independent basis to exercise jurisdiction over a legal malpractice claim [See Doc. 12 at 7 n.9]. fails to state a claim and amendment would be futile, it is appropriate to dismiss the Complaint. See Wershe v. City of Detroit, Mich.,
112 F.4th 357, 372 (6th Cir. 2024) (“Dismissal with prejudice is appropriate when the complaint could not be saved by an amendment” (internal quotation omitted)). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report [Doc. 12] under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and DISMISSES the Complaint [Doc. 1]. An appropriate judgment shall enter. SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown