Costner v. Gram

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Costner v. Gram

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

STEVEN S. COSTNER, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 3:24-CV-453-KAC-DCP ) SHAWN GRAM, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION

This action is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Poplin’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) [Doc. 12]. On November 6, 2024, Plaintiff Steven S. Costner Sr., who is proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint [Doc. 1] against Defendants. Upon screening the Complaint, the Report concluded that the Complaint failed to state a plausible claim against any Defendant [See Doc. 12 at 6-8].1 The Report further concluded that granting Plaintiff leave to amend sua sponte would be futile due to the significant deficiencies in the Complaint [See id. at 8]. Therefore, the Report recommends that the undersigned dismiss the Complaint [See id. at 9]. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report, and the time to do so has passed [See id., n. 12 (providing fourteen (14) days to file any objections to the Report)]. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.72(b)(2). As the Report ably analyzed, the Complaint, liberally construed, fails to state any claim upon which relief may be granted against any Defendant [See

id. at 6-8

]. Because the Complaint

1 The Report also indicated that to the extent the Complaint could be read to assert a legal malpractice claim, not a federal claim under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

, the Court would lack an independent basis to exercise jurisdiction over a legal malpractice claim [See Doc. 12 at 7 n.9]. fails to state a claim and amendment would be futile, it is appropriate to dismiss the Complaint. See Wershe v. City of Detroit, Mich.,

112 F.4th 357

, 372 (6th Cir. 2024) (“Dismissal with prejudice is appropriate when the complaint could not be saved by an amendment” (internal quotation omitted)). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report [Doc. 12] under

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and DISMISSES the Complaint [Doc. 1]. An appropriate judgment shall enter. SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown