Shields v. Alexander

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Shields v. Alexander

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

) CARALE SHIELDS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:24-cv-01082-JDB-jay ) SHERIFF FLOYD BONNER, JR., ) ) Respondent. ) )

AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MODIFY THE DOCKET AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE RELEVANT PORTIONS OF THE STATE COURT RECORD AND A LIMITED RESPONSE TO § 2254 PETITION

The Petitioner, Carale Shields, inmate number 521998, who is incarcerated at the Shelby County Correctional Center in Memphis, Tennessee, has filed a pro se Petition Under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by the Person in State Custody (the “Petition”). (Docket Entry (“D.E.) 1.) Petitioner has paid the habeas filing fee. (D.E. 5.) The Petition is before the Court on preliminary review. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (“Habeas Rules”).1 In inmate challenges his Tennessee convictions from 1997 for five counts of sale of a controlled substance in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-17-417(A)(3). It is ORDERED, pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, that Respondent file a limited response/answer to the Petition no later than twenty-eight days from the date of this order, addressing the timeliness

1The proper Respondent to this action is Petitioner’s custodian Anthony Alexander, Director of the Shelby County Correctional Center. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d); see also Rumsfeld v. Padilla,

542 U.S. 426, 435

(2004). The Clerk is DIRECTED to record the Respondent as Director Alexander and to terminate Sheriff Bonner as a party to this action. of the Petition. The filing shall include the relevant portions of the state court record, organized and appropriately indexed, as required by Administrative Order 16-31.2 Pursuant to Rule 5(e), Shields may, if he chooses, submit a reply to Respondent’s answer or response within twenty-eight days of service. Petitioner may request an extension of time to reply if his motion is filed on or before the due date of the reply. The Court will address the merits

of the Petition, or of any motion filed by Respondent, after the expiration of Shields’s time to reply, as extended. It is ORDERED that the Clerk shall send a copy of the Petition and this order to the Respondent and the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter by certified mail. See Habeas Rule 4. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail the parties the form for Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (AO 85). IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of July 2025.

s/ J. DANIEL BREEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2The party filing a document has the burden of ensuring the proper protection of sensitive information and taking measures to seal such information where appropriate. See Electronic Case Filing Attorney User Manual for the United States District Court, Western District of Tennessee, Section I.A.13; see also Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures Manual for the United States District Court Western District of Tennessee, Section 8 Sealed Documents, https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/sites/tnwd/files/LocalRules.pdf (last accessed July 7, 2025). 2

Reference

Status
Unknown