Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity, 1807

Boyer v. Porter

Boyer v. Porter
Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · Decided November 6, 1807 · Powell, Overton, Campbell
1 Tenn. 258

Counsel

DICKINSON, for the plaintiff, upon the hearing, prayed for a perpetual injunction as to the judgment, and that the money paid should be refunded. STUART, for the defendant, observed that the proper way for the plaintiff to proceed was by attachment under the Act of Assembly, for a contempt in not putting in a full answer the last term. DICKINSON, e contra. — We have excepted to the answer, still the defendant ought to satisfy the Court that he has a title to the land sold; this he has evaded in the second answer, though it was the particular cause of exception to the first.

Boyer v. Porter

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Powell, J. and Overton, J.(Campbell, J. absent)

The defendant has not shewn us how he can make a title, though he has been particularly called upon to do it. The law is, that the title deeds themselves, or copies, would be higher evidence than the defendant’s oath, in the general way which he has sworn ; and as the plaintiff has it not in his power in this case, to shew that the defendant cannot make a right, nor can evidence be expected from him to that, effect ; the defendant ought to prove the affirmative, unless he had produced or referred to deeds of record. As he has not done it, let the money received be refunded, and the defendant perpetually enjoined from receiving the balance.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.