Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity, 1808

Dixon's Lessee v. Cavenaugh

Dixon's Lessee v. Cavenaugh
Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · Decided November 6, 1808 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
1 Tenn. 365

Counsel

GRUNDY, for the plaintiff, moved that the plea might be set aside as frivolous, as no plea in abatement could be sustained in an ejectment. HAYS, e contra. &#8212; When a plea in abatement is regularly put in there must be a replication or demurrer. 1 Tidd's Pr. 588.

Dixon's Lessee v. Cavenaugh

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The act of 1801, c. 11. directs, that bail shall be taken of defendants in ejectment, so that costs may be rendered safe. If bail should not be given, the defendant must be committed of course. This act has induced the same necessity for precision in the name of a defendant in ejectment, as in any other action. Therefore the plea will be. But what will be its effect ? Not an abatment of the action. That remains as before the passage of the act ; the same form in every respect.

The plea in abatement discharges the defendants bail, but notice having been served on him, and having disclosed in his plea his true name, he must plead in chief by that name, or the court will permit judgment by default to be taken against him, and he will be turned out of possession.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.