Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity, 1809

Berger v. Harrison

Berger v. Harrison
Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · Decided September 6, 1809
1 Tenn. 483

Counsel

MILLER, for the clerk and master, suggested that the clerk ought to have his costs, if the parties had a mind to continue. WHITESIDE said the parties had a right at all times to continue, nor could the Court interfere.

Berger v. Harrison

Addendum

was of opinion that it should be continued at the cost of the applicant.

Opinion of the Court

In Equity. — This cause had been continued, by consent, for several years. Continuances, whether by consent or otherwise, are under the direction of the Court. The clerk has an interest, as is suggested, and it would be the most unreasonable thing imaginable to suppose that the parties might continue ad infinitum, if they thought proper. Supposing this to be the case, we never should get clear of a suit after being amicably compounded. Having no interest in a determination, both parties might agree to continue. Where causes are continued by consent, a much greater latitude will be allowed than where either party is pressing for trial; but there should be some end of cases on the docket.

WHITESIDE then stated the ground why the cause had been continued for such a length of time.

Addendum

In this case let the cause be continued as usual, to which CAMPBELL, J., assented, and OVERTON, J., acquiesced. So the cause was continued.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.