M'Connell v. Read

Tennessee Supreme Court
M'Connell v. Read, 8 Tenn. 224 (Tenn. 1827)

M'Connell v. Read

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

To show a variance, between the note or obligation declared on, and the one said to be produced, oyer should have been craved, the instrument set out, and thereby made a part of the record. The court will not notice the clerk’s recital of an obligation, not made a part of the record by the pleadings. The justice of the case is attained, therefore affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed,

Reference

Full Case Name
Francis M'Connell v. Thomas Read
Status
Published