Cannon adm'r v. Hollis
Cannon adm'r v. Hollis
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The declaration in this case, states the party plaintiff, as Rachel Cannon, administratrix of Newton Cannon, who sues for the use of Joseph Pond. The action is covenant, and the declaration states the cause of action to have arisen upon the breaches of the condition of a bond which the defendants entered into, signed and sealed, and in which they “acknowledge
We do not say, that upon just such a bond, as is set forth in the declaration in this case, the successors of Newton Cannon, in the office of Governor, might not, by proper averments, maintain an action., Upon the face of this declaration, however, the bond is not set out in terms, or by averment, as to show that it is a good statutory office bond; and, therefore, it did not, and could not vest in the personal representative of Newton Cannon, whose name is used as plaintiff in this action.
The demurrer must, therefore, be overruled, the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and the case be-remanded for further proceedings.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cannon adm'r. v. Holliss.
- Status
- Published