Ware v. Childress
Ware v. Childress
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a struggle between the State of Tennessee and E. H. Childress for a fund in the hands of Mansfield Ware, under the following circumstances: Mansfield Ware was the sheriff of Haywood county, and, as such, became indebted to the State for taxes collected by him. William B. Miller was attorney general for the' solicitorial district of which the county of Haywood was a part. The claim in favor of the State against Ware was placed by the Comptroller in his hands for collection. Ware, instead of paying the money, executed his note, with endorsers, to Miller for the amount, with the intention of having it discounted at the Union Bank at Jackson; this not being done, Ware afterwards paid Miller the amount in money, but neglected to take up his note. Miller,- being indebted to defendant, Childress, transferred this note of Ware, after it fell due, to him, as collateral security for his debt. Ware, upon being sued, complaine d
The judgment of the chancellor will, therefore, be reversed, and a decree for the amount due from-Ware given in favor of the State.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.