McClellan v. Cunningham
McClellan v. Cunningham
1 Thompson 30; 1 Shan. Cas. 15
McClellan v. Cunningham
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the'Court:
The promise contained in the paper signed by McClellan was not nudum pactum, but the word “deliverable” in that paper, and the letter of McClellan, from Washington city, were sufficient to authorise the jury to infer an agreement on the part of Cunningham to deliver. the morus multicaulis roots and cuttings.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.