McClellan v. Cunningham

Tennessee Supreme Court
McClellan v. Cunningham, 1 Thompson 30 (Tenn. 1847)
1 Shan. Cas. 15
Reese

McClellan v. Cunningham

Opinion of the Court

Reese, J.,

delivered the opinion of the'Court:

The promise contained in the paper signed by McClellan was not nudum pactum, but the word “deliverable” in that paper, and the letter of McClellan, from Washington city, were sufficient to authorise the jury to infer an agreement on the part of Cunningham to deliver. the morus multicaulis roots and cuttings.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Cited By
18 cases
Status
Published