Shelby v. State
Shelby v. State
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
We think the evidence in the record before us, does not support the charge in the indictment, or warrant the conviction of the defendant.
It might very well be admitted, that the right of way, or “easement” acquired by the public, in the present case, has not been lost by non-user; but on the contrary, that it might be resumed if deemed proper by the public. Though on this point we, at present, mean to express no opinion. But it is very clear that such easement may be abandoned, or the use thereof discontinued by the public. And if the public cease to use a road, and adopt another, and thereupon the owner of the soil over which the old road passed, resume the use and occupancy thereof, and the public acquiesce therein for the period of three years, the discontinuance, or abandonment of the old road may well be presumed, in absence of all evidence indicating a contrary intention on the part of the public. In this case there is no evidence of any such intention; and if such existed, the burden of proof was on the prosecutor. The use of the old road by a -few individuals in the immediate vicinity
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Status
- Published