Richardson v. Richardson
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Centennial Savings Bank Fsb, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant (5th Cir. 1989)
- Laduca v. Draves (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1911)
- Knickerbocker v. Robinson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- Berger v. . Varrelmann (N.Y. 1891)
- Cowling v. Cowling, Unpublished Decision (5-26-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
- Dugan Brothers of N.J. v. Robinson (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1947)
- In re Thompson's Estate (Utah 1927)
- Sutton v. Thompson (Utah 1927)
- Oxborough v. St. Martin (Minn. 1926)
- Smith v. Birdsall (Ill. App. Ct. 1903)
- People ex rel. Bibb v. Mayor & Common Council (Ill. 1901)
- Collar v. Patterson (Ill. 1891)
- McElroy v. Ludlum (N.J. 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is' a bill to settle an insolvent estate. Certain creditors not being made parties by the bill, come into Court, defend, and appeal from the decree of the Chancellor to this Court. The bill' of exceptions states that the creditors appealing, have been regarded as parties; but there is no order of record' making them such. The proper practice is, for the creditors to come in by petition and have themselves made parties.1 The recitals in the record afford sufficient ground to- award a certiorari to
The Act of 1837 does not do away with the necessity of showing the proper parties to be before the Court, That Act was intended only to diminish costs, by preventing the record from being encumbered with matter not relevant to the point to be brought up.
•Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.