Barrett v. Thomas
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Freeman Appeal from Doings of Commissioners (Conn. 1899)
- Department of Labor v. Americare Healthcare Services, LLC (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2025)
- David Thompson v. Regions Security Services, Inc. (11th Cir. 2025)
- WOFFORD v. SEBA ABODE, INC. (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2024)
- United States v. Ronald Shepard (D.C. Cir. 1975)
- AM Edwards Co. v. Dunnington (La. Ct. App. 1952)
- Bonner v. Surman (Ark. 1949)
- Burrow v. Lewis (Tenn. Ct. App. 1940)
- Mitchell v. Ellmaker Et Ux. (Pa. Super. Ct. 1938)
- Roddy v. United States Fire Insurance (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas 1935)
- Blacksher Co. v. Northrup (Ala. 1911)
- Hunt v. Marsh (Mo. 1883)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The petition for, cetiorari does not show a sufficient cause for not appealing ; but this is nota case where that is ma-
A void judgment is the same as no judgment at all, and all who aot under it are trespassers. Sherrell v. Goodrum, 3 Humph. 431; Andrews v. State, 2 Sneed, 550, 552.
And process issued upon it may be superceded and quashed. Mabry v. State, 9 Yerg. 207, 208.
And it may be appealed from. Trousdale v. Donnell, 4 Humph. 273.
And a writ of error lies to it. Martin Ex parte, 5 Yerg. 456.
And the Supreme Court will not reverse it, but will quash any process issued to enforce it. Bartlett v. Wilkenson, Infra; Andrews v. State, ubi supra.
But the Court rendering such a judgment cannot reverse it at a subsequent term. Id. Andrews v. State, ubi supra; But see Hopkins v. Godbehire, 2 Yerg. 241.
A void judgment may be enjoined. Coles v. Anderson, 8 Humph. 489;
Bell v. Williams, 1 Head, 229; Ridgeway v. Bank of Tenn., 11 Humph. 523. But unless void on its face, a judgment or decree cannot be attacked collaterally.
Hall v. Heffly, 6 Humph. 444; Thacker v. Chambers, 5 Humph. 313; Brittain v. Cowen, 6 Humph. 319
Judgments rendered during the civil war are valid. Parks v. Jones, 2 Cold. 172.
The judgements of courts established by the U. S. military authorities in the insurrectionary districts during the late war are valid. Hefferman v. Porter, 6 Cold. 391.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.