State v. Gilmore
State v. Gilmore
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an action of covenant, founded upon the official bond of Gilmore, as sheriff of Shelby county, and his securities. Judgment was for the defendants, and an appeal in error to this Court.
The case as presented in the declaration and proof is this: On the 27th January, 1853, the plaintiff placed in the hands of Gilmore, as sheriff, for collection, a note on Hamlin & Hart, for an amount within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, for which Gilmore, as sheriff, executed a receipt, binding himself to account for the same as required by law.
Sometime in the latter part of the year 1853, Gilmore, without having brought suit on said note, collected from Hart $150, the balance due thereon; of this sum he failed to pay over $100, to recover which the present suit was brought.
The Court instructed the jury, that if Gilmore, as sheriff, had collected money, on a claim within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, without suit, and
The Court erred in this instruction. The act of 1827, ch. 85, § 4, provides that, “ In all cases wherein a sheriff, or his deputies, shall collect money by virtue of any execution, issued by a justice of the peace, or by warrant, or otherwise, within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, said sheriff and his securities shall be held liable on their bond for all money collected as aforesaid.” The language of this statute leaves no doubt as to what was the intention of the Legislature. The plain construction of the law is, that for all sums of money collected by a sheriff, or his deputy, upon claims placed in his hands for collection, in his official character, the sheriff and his sureties shall be liable upon their official bond, regardless of whether the money was collected before or after judgment, or by, or without legal process.
The judgment will be reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.