Ivey v. Ingram
Ivey v. Ingram
44 Tenn. 129
Ivey v. Ingram
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
There is no error in the decree of the Chancellor, and it will he affirmed.
The fact, that process was not served upon the infant defendants, until after the appointment of a guardian, ad litem, and after he had filed an answer on their behalf, renders the sale, not merely irregular and voidable, but absolutely void; and in such cases, sales are incapable of confirmation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.