Kelton v. Jacobs
Kelton v. Jacobs
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a scire facias in favor of the executrix and executor to revive a judgment obtained by testator, on which George Kelton was stay or. The proceeding was prosecuted against the stayor alone, the principal debtor not having been served with due process.
Two questions only are presented in argument before us.
1. It is insisted the matter was res adjudícala.
There is nothing in this, A sci. fa. had been issued, and the party served. The plaintiffs failed to appear, and thereupon the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, without any examination on the merits. This is no bar to subsequent suit.
2. It is insisted the court erred in refusing to allow the principal in the judgment to be examined as a witness to prove that the debt had been paid.
This objection is well taken. He was not party to the proceeding. He was equally liable for the debt to plaintiffs, whether Kelton succeeded or not. His interest would not be affected. If he had been directly interested, the act of 1869 removed his disability as a. witness on this account. See Code, sec. 3813c. It is said he was excluded under the other section of this statute, providing that “in actions or proceedings by or against executors, administrators or
Reference
- Full Case Name
- George Kelton v. Mary Jacobs, and D. P. Jacobs
- Status
- Published