Ayrnett v. Edmundson
Ayrnett v. Edmundson
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Ayrnett, the clerk of the county court of Giles ■county, insists that Edmundson, trustee of Brown, is liable for a merchant’s tax, and they, upon an agreed ■state of facts, submitted the question to the Hod. John V. Wright, circuit judge, who decided in favor of defendant, and Ayrnett has appealed to this court.
The facts are, that J. R,. C. Brown was a merchant in Pulaski, February 19, 1877, and then engaged In selling dry goods, groceries, etc.; on that day he assigned all his stock of merchandise to Edmundson, as trustee, to sell the same and pay on debts due from Brown.
In this case Edmundson is a trustee, to whom a failing debtor, for the benefit of his creditors, has made an assignment. Amongst the property assigned is a stock of goods. While he was trading and dealing in dry goods and groceries, Brown was a merchant, within the meaning of the law, but upon his assignment he ceased to be a merchant; nor did the transfer to Edmondson of the stock of goods, charged with the trust of turning them into money to pay debts, make him a merchant within the meaning of the law, so as to be bound to take out license or pay tax before he can sell the assigned property. The trading and dealing in goods, wares and merchandise imply not only selling but buying to sell, as an avocation or business.
This is very different from undertaking, as a trustee, to convert an insolvent debtor’s assigned effects into money for the benefit of his creditors. A trustee in such a case is not a merchant, or liable to be taxed as such, and it makes no difference whether the effects assigned are goods, wares and merchandise, or any other property.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- H. H. Ayrnett, Clerk, etc. v. E. Edmundson, Trustee
- Status
- Published