Bank v. Lumber Co.
Bank v. Lumber Co.
Opinion of the Court
At á former day of the term, the complainant in this cause obtained a decree against the Cumberland Lumber Company and other defendants, upon a note for $800, and interest thereon. Mrs. Henrietta C. Ewing, one of the makers of the note, was relieved from personal liability because a married woman; but her separate estate, which she
The motion must be overruled. The exemption of a homestead in this State is allowed, in the first instance, to the head of the family alone, and is assignable only in real estate, or interests therein, owned by the person occupying that position. Const., Art. 11, ‘Sec. 11; Code, T. & S., §§ 2110a,. 2113a, 2115a; M. & V.;§§2935, 2936, 2937, 2938; Shann., §§ 3798, 3800; 3801, 3802. The husband is the legal head of the family where the marital relation exists, and, for that reason, the homestead, if assigned during his life, is assignable to him and from his property. Neither the wife nor the husband is entitled to the exemption of a homestead in her land. Turner v. Argo, 89 Tenn., 443. She is not entitled to it because not the head of the family; and he is not entitled to it because he does not own the property.
Let the motion be overruled.
Reference
- Status
- Published