Tennessee Supreme Court, 2006

State of Tennessee v. David Ivy - Concurring and Dissenting

State of Tennessee v. David Ivy - Concurring and Dissenting
Tennessee Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 2006 · Justice Adolopho A. Birch, Jr.

State of Tennessee v. David Ivy - Concurring and Dissenting

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 9, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID IVY Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 01-12388 Joseph B. Dailey, Judge

No. W2003-00786-SC-DDT-DD - Filed February 28, 2006

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the conclusion of the majority that Ivy’s convictions should be affirmed. As to the sentence of death, however, I respectfully dissent. I continue to adhere to my view that the comparative proportionality review protocol currently embraced by the majority is inadequate to shield defendants from the arbitrary and disproportionate imposition of the death penalty. See State v. Reid, 164 S.W.3d 286, 323-325 (Tenn. 2005)(Birch, J., concurring and dissenting), and cases cited therein. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion affirming the imposition of the death penalty in this case.

___________________________________ ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.