Barnes v. State
Barnes v. State
Opinion of the Court
The indictment upon which appellant was tried and convicted fails to negative, except by inference, that the money and other property taken by the appellant and his co-defendant from the possession of the injured party, by violence and putting him in fear, was the property of the persons indicted. An indictment for robbery must clearly show upon its face, by appropriate averment, that the property taken belonged to some person other than the accused, or that the party deprived of the possession through
The indictment being defective in substance, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- J. R. Barnes v. State
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Robbery. —Indictment for robbery must, by appropriate averment, show that the property taken belonged to some person other than the accused, or that the person deprived of its possession was entitled thereto as against the accused. One who, being entitled to the possession of his own chattel, takes it by violence from another, is not guilty of robbery.