Opinion.— Plaintiffs set forth in their affidavit two causes for attachment, which are not only distinct, but inconsistent; both cannot be true.

If the defendants had disposed of their property it was beyond their reach; hence they could not convert it into money in order to defraud their creditors. This affidavit is similar to the one in Dunnenbaum v. Schram, 59 Tex., 281.

Judgment affirmed.