Kraft, Holmes & Co. v. Sims
Kraft, Holmes & Co. v. Sims
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
§ 404. Contract, incomplete when, and rights of parties to mutuality in. Reinhart, a drummer of K., H. &
It is elementary that “a promise is a good consideration for a promise,” but it is further settled that “a promise is not a good consideration for a promise unless there is an absolute mutuality of engagement, so that each party has the right at once to hold the other to a positive agreement.” [1 Pars, on Cont. (5th ed.) pp. 448-9.]
§ 405. Assent of parties to a contract. A contract requires the assent of the parties to an agreement, and this agreement must be obligatory, and the obligation must in general be mutual. [1 Pars, on Cont. 475.]
§ 406. Incomplete contract. In Eskridge v. Glover, 5 Stew. &. P. 264, it was held that an incomplete contract or agreement which one of the parties has the option of completing at a particular day, raises a mutual right of rescission in the other party at any time before the ratification by the first. [1 Pars, on Cont. (5thed.) p. 476, and note.] Held, that the contract in this case was incomplete, and both parties could rescind in the ten days.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.