Wyers v. State
Wyers v. State
Opinion of the Court
It is shown by the record that the honorable Anson Rainey, judge of the fortieth judicial district, before whom the trial of this case was had, was presiding in exchange with the honorable Eugene Williams, judge of the district in
Defendant requested the court to charge the jmy as follows: βAn unrecorded brand is no evidence of ownership, and as the brand of S. B. Bryan has not been recorded, it will be no evidence of ownership in Bryan to the steer in controversy; and unless such steer has been proven by other evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, to be the property of Bryan, you will acquit.β This requested instruction was refused. The law is unquestionably as stated in said instruction, and the evidence demands that it should be given. (Coffelt v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App., 436.)
Other questions presented in the record are not discussed, because in our opinion the only material error in the conviction is the one above stated, and for this error the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.