Ellison v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
Ellison v. State, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 328 (1888)
8 S.W. 462; 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54
Willson
Ellison v. State
Opinion of the Court
It is essential in all prosecutions for theft, except for theft from the person, and theft of a horse, mule, ass or cattle, to both allege and prove the value of the property stolen. In this case the conviction is for the theft of corn, and there is no proof whatever in the record in support of the allegation of value. Wherefore the conviction is not warranted by the evidence, and must be set aside. (Willson’s Texas Crim. Stats., sec. 1285.)
There are other questions presented in the record which we do not determine, because they are not likely to arise on another trial.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Floyd Ellison v. State
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Theft—Evideítob.-t-To support a conviction for theft, unless it be for theft from, the person, or of a horse, mule, ass or cattle, it devolves upon the State to prove the value of the property stolen. The proof in this case is insufficient, because there \was no evidence adduced to support the allegation of value."