Dailey v. State
Dailey v. State
27 Tex. Ct. App. 569; 11 S.W. 636; 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 87
Dailey v. State
Opinion of the Court
This conviction is not supported by the evidence in the record. Defendant is charged in the indictment with playing cards at a public place, to wit? at Starkey’s gin. It was not proved that he played cards at said gin.
Furthermore, the indictment is bad. A gin is not one of the places or houses designated by the statute as public; wherefore it was necessary to allege in the indictment the facts which made it a public place. (Tummins v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 12.)
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.