Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Courts of Appeals /

1894

478 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1894.

  • Heidenheimer Bros. v. Baumgarten 29 S.W. 208, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. McKee 29 S.W. 544, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Daniels 28 S.W. 548, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Luzenberg v. Bexar Building & Loan Ass'n 29 S.W. 237, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Patten v. Cox 29 S.W. 182, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Nelson 29 S.W. 78, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Gulf Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wilm 28 S.W. 925, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Johnson v. Lyford 29 S.W. 57, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Howard, Administrator v. Herman 29 S.W. 542, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • De Walt v. Zeigler & McIlhenny 29 S.W. 60, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Fannin County v. Hightower 29 S.W. 187, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gill 28 S.W. 911, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Kenney v. Lane 36 S.W. 1063, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Long v. Cruger 28 S.W. 568, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Collyns v. Cain 28 S.W. 544, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Jack v. Cassin 28 S.W. 832, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Staples v. Llano County 28 S.W. 569, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Louisiana Sugar Refining Co. v. Harrison 29 S.W. 500, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Piner 29 S.W. 66, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Abernethy, Administrator v. Bass 29 S.W. 398, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Southern Pacific Railway Co. v. Kennedy 29 S.W. 394, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • J. Laing & Co. v. State 26 S.W. 1040, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Boehringer v. A. B. Richards Medicine Co. 29 S.W. 508, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Crawford v. Saunders Bro. 29 S.W. 102, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Fraser & Chalmers v. Echo Mining & Smelting Co. 28 S.W. 714, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • White v. Cole 29 S.W. 1148, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Pumphrey v. Threadgill 28 S.W. 450, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Evans v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. 28 S.W. 903, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Weir Plow Co. v. Armentrout, Fraser & Chew 29 S.W. 405, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Kallman v. Ludenecker 28 S.W. 579, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Montgomery v. Brown 28 S.W. 834, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Way 29 S.W. 205, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Martin-Brown Company v. Henderson 28 S.W. 695, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Burlington Insurance v. Rivers 28 S.W. 453, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Merchants National Bank v. Barker 28 S.W. 698, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Naugher v. Patterson 28 S.W. 582, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Salmon v. Huff 28 S.W. 1044, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Clay County Land & Cattle Co. v. Montague County 28 S.W. 704, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Cohen v. Oliver 29 S.W. 81, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Cole 28 S.W. 391, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hudman 28 S.W. 388, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Watkins v. Sproull 28 S.W. 356, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Hensel v. Kegans 28 S.W. 705, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Stanus v. Smith 30 S.W. 262, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Diamond Mill Co. v. Groesbeck National Bank 29 S.W. 169, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Puckett v. McDaniel 28 S.W. 360, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • La Force v. Wear & Boogher Dry Goods Co. 29 S.W. 75, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Mardes v. Meyers 28 S.W. 693, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Gann 28 S.W. 349, (Tex. App. 1894)
  • M. T. Jones Lumber Co. v. Villegas 28 S.W. 553, (Tex. App. 1894)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 10 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑