1898
339 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1898.
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Overfield 47 S.W. 684, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Silverman v. Landrum 47 S.W. 404, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Foster v. Eoff 47 S.W. 399, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Clemons 47 S.W. 731, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Warner 49 S.W. 254, (Tex. App. 1898)
- H. D. Timmons & Co. v. Casey 47 S.W. 805, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Rose 49 S.W. 133, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Settle 47 S.W. 825, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Turner v. Crane 47 S.W. 822, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Patterson, Garnishee v. Seeton 47 S.W. 732, (Tex. App. 1898)
- McGhee v. Romatka 47 S.W. 291, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Ceccato v. Deutschman 47 S.W. 739, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Cabaness v. Holland 47 S.W. 379, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Laucheimer v. Saunders 47 S.W. 543, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Parish v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance 49 S.W. 153, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Laing v. O'Connor 48 S.W. 546, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Avery 46 S.W. 897, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Jemison v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co. 46 S.W. 886, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Berchfield 46 S.W. 900, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Chicago, Rock Island & Texas Railway Co. v. Porterfield 46 S.W. 919, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Clark v. Winn 46 S.W. 915, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Huffman v. Eastham 47 S.W. 35, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Duke v. E. P. Cleaver & Co. 46 S.W. 1128, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Supreme Lodge National Reserve Ass'n. v. Turner 47 S.W. 44, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Bammel v. Kirby, Receiver 47 S.W. 392, (Tex. App. 1898)
- W. L. Moody & Co. v. First National Bank 46 S.W. 660, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Williams v. Yoe 46 S.W. 659, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Cooper Grocery Co. v. Moore 46 S.W. 665, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Long v. Behan 48 S.W. 555, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Hardeman County v. Foard County 47 S.W. 30, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Koehler v. Cochran 47 S.W. 394, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Parsons v. Hart 46 S.W. 856, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Moore, McKinney & Co. v. Masterson 46 S.W. 855, (Tex. App. 1898)
- York v. Carlisle 46 S.W. 257, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Burton v. Dupree 46 S.W. 272, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Jackson 46 S.W. 279, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Williamson v. Huffman 47 S.W. 276, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Louisiana Extension Railway Co. v. Carstens 47 S.W. 36, (Tex. App. 1898)
- I. G.N.R.R. Co. v. Satterwhite 47 S.W. 41, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Andrews v. Bonham 46 S.W. 902, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Shotwell v. McCardell 47 S.W. 39, (Tex. App. 1898)
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Culpepper 46 S.W. 922, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Carson & Foley v. Taylor 47 S.W. 395, (Tex. App. 1898)
- International & Great Northern Railroad v. Satterwhite 19 Tex. Civ. App. 170, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Wade v. Nunnelly 46 S.W. 668, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Citizens' Railway Co. v. Holmes 46 S.W. 116, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Crocker, Administrator v. Crocker 46 S.W. 870, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Pardee v. Adamson 46 S.W. 43, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Maughmer v. Behring 46 S.W. 917, (Tex. App. 1898)
- Hamm, Administratrix v. Hutchins 46 S.W. 873, (Tex. App. 1898)