Williamson v. Heath
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Puretex Lemon Juice, Inc. v. S. Riekes & Sons of Dallas, Inc. (Tex. App. 1961)
- Southern California Enterprises, Inc. v. D. N. & E. Walter & Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)
- San Antonio Traction Co. v. Roberts (Tex. App. 1912)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— The contract of Williamson was not alone a verbal guarantee that the bull was a breeder, but that he would refund the purchase money, less the value of the bull for beef, upon satisfactory proof that the bull was barren. Appellee had no cause of action until this satisfactory proof was made, and this was not done until within two years of the filing of the suit. There was no unreasonable delay on appellee’s part. We hold that the two years statute applies. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.