Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Courts of Appeals /

1913

1201 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1913.

  • Hill v. Whitworth 162 S.W. 434, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Sealey 162 S.W. 455, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Johnson v. Hall 163 S.W. 399, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Havard v. Carter-Kelley Lumber Co. 162 S.W. 922, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Lawson v. Hamilton Compress Co. 162 S.W. 1023, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Williams v. McComb 163 S.W. 654, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • State v. MacKen 162 S.W. 1160, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Childress v. Robinson 162 S.W. 1172, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Carter v. Walker 165 S.W. 483, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Skaggs v. Mudd 162 S.W. 371, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Goldstein v. Saur 162 S.W. 441, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Uvalde Nat. Bank v. Brooks 162 S.W. 957, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Malone v. National Bank of Commerce of Kansas City 162 S.W. 369, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. Jaimes 162 S.W. 965, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • MacKay Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Bain 163 S.W. 98, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kersten 161 S.W. 1091, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Masterson Irr. Co. v. Foote 163 S.W. 642, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Rentz 162 S.W. 959, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Penn v. Briscoe County 162 S.W. 916, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Copeland 164 S.W. 857, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • McDowell v. Northcross 162 S.W. 13, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Dubose v. Woods 162 S.W. 3, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Armstrong v. Parr 162 S.W. 1003, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Johnson v. Ft. Worth Driving Club 164 S.W. 875, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Childs v. Juenger 162 S.W. 474, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Jarvis v. Taylor County 163 S.W. 334, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Hicks v. Murphy 162 S.W. 925, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Hammel v. Benton 162 S.W. 34, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • San Antonio Traction Co. v. Crisp 162 S.W. 422, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Burk 162 S.W. 457, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Maples 162 S.W. 426, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Burton 162 S.W. 479, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Slover v. Goode 163 S.W. 333, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Gillett v. Holligan 162 S.W. 367, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Northern Assur. Co. v. Morrison 162 S.W. 411, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Fawcett 162 S.W. 10, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Johnson 164 S.W. 903, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Balch v. San Antonio, F. N. R. Co. 161 S.W. 1091, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Drahn 163 S.W. 330, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Deggs v. Loving 162 S.W. 9, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Matthews v. Perminter 162 S.W. 1180, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Knight v. Armstrong 162 S.W. 448, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Crawford v. Crawford 163 S.W. 115, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Cox v. Garrow 162 S.W. 924, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • El Paso Electric Ry. Co. v. Davidson 162 S.W. 937, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Lafferty v. Wilson 162 S.W. 379, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Ragley-McWilliams Lumber Co. 162 S.W. 1183, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Walker 161 S.W. 961, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Waco Cement Stone Works v. Smith 162 S.W. 1158, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Bonzer v. Garrett 162 S.W. 934, (Tex. App. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 25 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑