McWilliams v. Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Co.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Leonard v. Caruthers (Tex. App. 1921)
- Houston Electric Co. v. Schmidt (Tex. App. 1922)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
J. F. McWilliams, real estate agent, brought this suit for commissions for furnishing purchaser for certain tracts of land belonging to the defendant, Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Company.
On February 5, 1913, the statement of facts filed was stricken from the files, because not in compliance with rules 72 to 78 prescribed by the Supreme Court, for the reasons given in Albers v. Roberts, 150 S. W. 596.
The errors assigned in the appellant’s brief will not be considered, because they all relate to the charge of the court or to the admissibility of evidence, and they cannot be considered in the absence of statement of facts. Mayo v. Goldman, 44 Tex. Civ. App. 80, 97 S. W. 1061; Boyette v. Glass, 140 S. W. 819.
*557 There being no fundamental error apparent upon the face of the record, the cause must be ¿farmed; and it is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.