Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Courts of Appeals /

1913

1201 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1913.

  • Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Roth 159 S.W. 176, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Banner v. Thomas 159 S.W. 102, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Bennett v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. 159 S.W. 132, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Wynne v. State 158 S.W. 783, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Morgan v. Lomas 159 S.W. 869, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Wichita Falls & W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Wyrick 158 S.W. 570, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Florence 157 S.W. 1199, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Sachs v. Goldberg 159 S.W. 92, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Blackstad Mercantile Co. v. J. W. Porter & Co. 158 S.W. 216, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Hefner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 160 S.W. 330, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Loomis v. Cobb 159 S.W. 305, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Taylor v. Taylor 157 S.W. 1184, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Commercial Jewelry Co. v. Hillin 157 S.W. 1190, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Dupont v. Texas N. O. R. Co. 158 S.W. 195, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Howell v. Bank of Snyder 158 S.W. 574, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Fisher v. Hemming 164 S.W. 913, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Harper v. Martin 157 S.W. 1180, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • South Texas Mortgage Co. v. Dozier 158 S.W. 1051, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Short 158 S.W. 175, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Pyle v. Pyle 159 S.W. 488, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Sullivan v. Fant 160 S.W. 612, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Gulp, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McGinnis 158 S.W. 1199, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Vickrey v. Dockray 158 S.W. 1160, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Ragland v. Guarantee Life Ins. Co. 157 S.W. 1187, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Hicks 158 S.W. 192, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Pearce v. Heyman 158 S.W. 242, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Bullitt v. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. 158 S.W. 782, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Gayle v. Gayle 157 S.W. 1187, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Guerra v. Guerra 158 S.W. 191, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Rips v. Herman 158 S.W. 781, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Stephenville, N. & S. T. Ry. Co. v. Voss 159 S.W. 64, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Turner v. Cunningham 158 S.W. 176, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Word 158 S.W. 561, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Hammond v. Pickett 158 S.W. 174, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Ross v. Kell 159 S.W. 119, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Kruegel v. Murphy & Bolanz 157 S.W. 1182, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • First State Bank of Teague v. Hadden 158 S.W. 1168, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Benson v. Wright 157 S.W. 1198, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Pate v. Vardeman 158 S.W. 1183, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Peters v. Rice 157 S.W. 1181, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Douglass v. Myrick 159 S.W. 422, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • McCullough v. Randall 158 S.W. 219, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. New Boston Hardware Co. 157 S.W. 1188, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Chambers v. Grisham 157 S.W. 1177, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Tune 158 S.W. 238, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Rainwater v. Gwaltney 157 S.W. 1191, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Holman v. Cowden Sutherland 158 S.W. 571, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Langbehn 158 S.W. 244, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Stansberry v. Booghery 158 S.W. 247, (Tex. App. 1913)
  • Texas Co. v. Veloz 162 S.W. 377, (Tex. App. 1913)
« Prev 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 25 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑